Saturday, July 7, 2012

Earliest Shriver

Once you read the acknowledgments and Qs and As at the back of We Have to Talk about Kevin, you would think that Lionel Shriver wrote nothing but clunkers previous to her Orange Prize winning book.  Not so, and my efforts to read most if not all of her earlier works has begun ... sort of adding box car books to this Lionel train (ooh, bad one).

Finished The Female of the Species last night, her first novel, with a picture of her on the back when she was only 29.  Although the plot outline could not be more different from the household tension in Kevin, there are nascent sub themes that carry forward.  Gray is a 59 year old anthropologist, single, never married, childless, tall, athletic and completely independent, in part due to the subservient devotion of a fellow anthropol, Errol, 12 years her junior and with a decades old crush.  Errol is the novel's narrator whose personal fantasies and frustrations permeate his rendition of Gray's enchantment with a 24 year old graduate student, Raphael.

While Gray's descent into sensuality is the story's main exploration.  Gray has many characteristics in common with Eva from Kevin:  she is highly intellectual, aloof, self-involved, with female "BFFs" and most herself when traveling the world, far from American culture.  Raphael previews most of Kevin's sociopathy:  he is completely manipulative, sarcastic, amoral, and plotting.  So here we have it:  Shriver's view of the sexes.  Men are the fatal attractions; personal decisions are open to judgments regarding their morality or impact on society.  Shriver is still in a bad guys die young structure and it will be interesting to see if that continues.  Her female "heroines" are left to age alone, opining about the interactions.

What is clever about this novel is having Gray be an anthropologist who can see patterns in primitive cultures and even extrapolate them the the burnt out, crack infested Bronx.  But she cannot understand people on a one to one basis.  It is like those eye charts of optic degeneration we have at work:  all she has is peripheral vision.  She cannot see the moral equivalence of Raphael to the WWII deserter she encountered in Africa when she began her career -- only the physical resemblance.

Early in the novel, Shriver introduces what her characters will continue to experience, as she describes Gray interacting with the threatening, attractive AWOL, Charles Corgie:  "The two of them stood face to face.  Perhaps they were gods now, at this moment, and this was omnipotence:  to know exactly how little they cared.  Glaring at each other silently, both Gray and Charles recited together their real credo:  Who cares about you, or anyone?  Who needs you, or anyone?  I blink and you disappear.  I turn my back on you and all I see is the door that I can walk out of, always.  I am tall and smart and powerful without you ... You think I want you, and sometimes even I think that, but you are wrong and that is weakness in me, for I am stronger than even I know ... So if ... you dissolve into the heavy air ... I will not care -- I will be thinking about my important work."

The following quote could just as easily have been placed in Kevin:  "... How did you get like this?  We have always been like this.  There was something before ... That was the mystery.  There was no explaining.  Raphael was a certain way and he had always been ... in his crib his eyes shone like that, like the metal on airplanes in the sun, and there was nothing to say about that, no explanation."

On to the next one.  

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Talking Heads

The book club selection for last month was Lionel Shriver’s We Have to Talk about Kevin.  I decided I did not want to talk about WHTTAK in a setting where the “bookies”-- for the most part -- work for or retired from the Office of Mental Health.  In fact, in April, one bookie asked the group what she should do to try to socialize a young boy in her Hebrew class who seemed to have no empathy at all and whose parents saw no problem.  Sort of a preview of the plot and continuation of this diagnostic conversation.  

But even with piles of books on the night stand and my blog list unattended I was curious.  I am so glad I picked up WHTTAK.  First, I loved Shriver’s juxtaposition of an 18th Century epistolary novel with a 20th Century character who is aloof, lives only in her head, and over-analyzes everything.  Second, I loved Eva and Franklin, who, to me, represented the ultimate married couple.  I tend to look at married couples and decide if they look like salt and pepper shakers; when I conclude they do, what I am concluding is that they sort of match, definitely are a pair, and are "put together" for the same intent or purposes.  While Eva and Franklin resemble more a box of dried prunes and a overripe bowl of cherries, psychologically, they are a marvelous study in parental child rearing conflict.  I was about to type compromises, but neither can move from their entrenched personality traits.  

Life to Eva is a glass half-full.  She tries to fill up the emptiness with world travel and business acumen and a standard of perfection that is stratospheric.  Franklin not only wants the glass to be bigger, overflowing and its contents carbonated, but also to be the source of all solace.  Franklin’s idealized view of America extends to his desire to make the perfect family, creating a dialogue and scenes that match up with the Happy Days reruns he watches. 


As NYC yuppies, E&F agree to accessorize their carefree life with a baby as Eva approaches 40.  As soon as she gets pregnant, Franklin sets out to mold her to his idealized stereotype of a mother:  no strenuous exercise, no alcohol.  Not that she was an alcoholic athlete, but Eva resents the loss of her personality.  Kevin is born more than cranky and /or Eva has PPD. Maybe she just doesn’t smell maternal.  Anyway, I find Kevin more a symbol against which Shriver expresses Eva’s existence.  Instead of being a high school mass murderer, he could have easily caused a major traffic accident or blown up the house like one boy did down our street.  The stigma on the family and the self-doubt about family life that outsiders see as having been the prime cause of a deviant or delinquent child seems the major, ur-theme.

The more I thought about vehicles Shriver was using in her writing, I kept coming back to the family/society issue.  Maybe this train of thought spilled over from the book club's discussion of the June book, our re-reading of The Great Gatsby, where the group concluded Fitzgerald was writing an allegory about American characteristics using the traits of his characters.  Along that line of analysis, Shriver seems to be saying that while it is the basic building block of society, the family in the late 20th Century is torn between being a "re-enactment" of an earlier ideal and being completely an incohesive unit of self-involved individuals, each ranking themselves above the needs and demands of sustaining a marriage and raising unruly children.

I kept my copy way beyond its due date so I could finish this blog entry with selected quotes, only to realize this morning I didn't dog-ear any pages.  For whatever reason, The Band's Cripple Creek is running through my head to describe Shriver's voice for Eva, when lyrics describe Spike Jones' music as the girl not liking his songs but loves "the way he talks."  No one would expect that preference and I did not expect to love Eva's internal dialogues.  I can't imagine the movie captures this even with Tilda Swinton ... and I prefer to keep the scenes of violence in my imagination rather than sensationalized on the big screen.






Monday, June 4, 2012

Everything to Excess


One of my favorite recently published books is Mr. Know It All by A. J. Jacobs which I came upon displayed on a table in a small bookstore in Portland, Oregon.  What I great book to keep your nose in flying home across the country, quietly giggling so as not to have the steward engage any TSA agents on the plane.  AJ’s premise in that book was to complete an adventure that was abandoned by his father:  to read the Encyclopedia Britannica from cover to cover.  Because AJ didn’t know what facts and characters he would stumble across in this effort, it was all rather innocently joyous:  his conclusion that to be assured of being mentioned as famous in the EB one had to either be a king’s mistress or invent a new type font; his citing of a misnomer, that is should be Daffy Drake; and his interviewing of the tomes themselves with taking the Mensa test and trying out for Jeopardy as surrogate measures about whether he was learning anything to improve his IQ.

In Drop Dead Healthy, AJ again dedicates a couple years to a single pursuit, this time trying to learn everything he can do to be the healthiest person on earth.  This time there is no logical alphabetic ordering approach, so he devotes a month to each organ in his body.  It doesn’t work as well as his first book:  sure he still has his trademark background of how his family reacts to his compulsions, his eye-rolling wife, his frail and ailing grandfather, and his eccentric aunt, but it ends up too gray.  He tracks down every ultra, maximum, intense approach to diet, exercise, mediation, et cetera, but each chapter ends with hallow partial endorsements.  It is risk-free, he does not chance recommending any action as beneficial.  
Soon, I was comparing it to the last medical quackery book I read from that guy that wants to read everyone’s protein chains.

How did I stray so far from my alphabetical 2012 listing of books I needed to read to make my literacy have fewer gaps?  I’ve concluded the problem is my reference to this year being a bucket list.  That conjures up thoughts to being at the tail end of one’s life and probably facing poorer health; ergo, these quasi-medical selections.  It also suggests one is approaching the ebbing golden years; hence, my need to read about my contemporaries, Carole King, Frank Langella, Greg Allman, to say to myself, well it least I led a better life, if less glamorous than theirs.  I must, I must, I must return to Tara.

Friday, June 1, 2012

Stations of the Cross

I finished the third of three autobiographies in the past month:  Carole King, Frank Langella and now Greg Allman.  I find myself asking this question:  “What am I looking for that can’t be found on Wiki?”

I mentioned in my Langella review that I preferred the writer sorting his or her life by impact rather than chronology.  Greg falls into the latter category.  If you follow ABB like I do, you know the origins and changes to band members.  Celebrity headlines, whether you avidly follow those kinds of magazines or not, have bombarded the public with tales of his marriages and substance abuse.  So what did I want to find in the book?

Personal insight.  Especially when the person writing about his life is at least 60, some reflection and self-assessment, if not wisdom, should come across:  why did I do these things, who got hurt in the process.  Greg’s last paragraph:  “I must have said this a million times, but if I died today, I have had me a blast.  I really mean that – if I fell over dead right not, I have led some kind of life.  I wouldn’t trade it for nobody’s, but I don’t know if I’d do it again.  If somebody offered me a second round, I think I’d have to pass on it.”  That tells me nothing.  Is it just post liver transplant that Greg doesn’t have the physical strength to party hardy.  No one could probably live the same life, but he has no inkling of how to avoid the crises without giving up the successes perforce.

Furthermore, I am left unsettled to how much of the book Greg actually wrote.  A couple of times, he protests about being smart, a "valedictorian" in either grammar or junior high school. (huh?).  His co-author is a man named Alan Light who wrote for Vibe and Spin and is an Ivy League grad.  Which way does the scale tip for you?

Greg plays with one of his song titles for the book, naming it My Cross to Bear, whereas the song is It’s Just Not My Cross to Bear.  His sins are heavy, pride being the greatest unacknowledged one. 

Thursday, May 24, 2012

You're Known by the Company You Keep

I was almost through Frank Langella’s Dropped Names before I realized all his brief encounters with the famous were reminiscences about people who had died … Frank makes them all seem so vivid and alive I never noticed they were obituaries  (or exposes that could not be regarded as libelous).  Obviously, some of these famous men and women are so well known that a reader remembers the times and circumstances of their deaths; others because they live on in legend and on the silver screen seem to be eternal icons.

I was almost two thirds of the way through the memoir before I realized how self-disclosive Frank was even when he seemed to intend on to only recount the characteristics of his friends and the special circumstances of their meeting, parting and discreetly doing other things in between.  Some of the names Frank drops are luminaries who simply cross his path – like Marilyn Monroe whom he sees on the street in New York City as a truant teenager escaping from New Jersey for the afternoon.  Those close encounters only show Frank’s luck and fortune.  

Other famous movie stars are portrayed with their flaws bared, but never viciously – Frank writes of Paul Newman’s eyes but more of his frailty.  Frank does not regard Paul as having much sex appeal despite his eyes because he never had “danger,” a quality that Frank believes is essential for a great actor (Palance, Cagney, Clift, Brando, Dean, McQueen are Frank’s personification of using one’s self-destructiveness to advance one’s art and conquests).  This last encounter shows Frank’s sensitivity and respect more than it shows Paul’s decline:   “… I turned around and looked into the baby blues I’d looked into some forty years earlier.  An old man now, face thin and ravaged, a beard for his next role, fine sparse hair blown around by the wind … I instinctively reached up to put his hair in place, smoothing it down with my fingers and making it neat.  I then moved my hands down to his cold cheeks and kissed them both.  He fixed me with a look of heartbreaking tenderness and I thought for a moment he might be fighting back tears.  There. Now you look like Paul Newman I said.  And what man wouldn’t want to look like Paul Newman.  It occurs to me no, as I write this, that perhaps he might have been that man.  Frank’s instincts outweigh his speculations, his hands defy his logic.

When Frank writes about what he liked in his friend Alan Bates, he discloses how his fellow actor imprinted him to aspire to the qualities he wanted to internalize:  “… Had Alan allowed himself the final call he so much deserved, he would have known how much they did adore him. He was a gentle, loving man whose humor, grace, kindness, and humanity constantly humbled me.  To watch him backstage as he struggled to his place before we took our curtain call together, clearly in pain and exhausted, then gather himself, smile at me across the way, and turn to fact the audience, was a lesson in gallantry I carry with me still.  No matter what, Alan was going to go on, not because the show must, but because his personal sense of integrity required it.  I’d give anything to have twenty minutes with him again.”

I only saw Frank on the stage once, in NYC when he appeared as Dracula.  I was at that point more interested in the Edward Gorey stage sets than in Frank as lead.  I never attended any performance at the Berkshire Playhouse or in Stockbridge despite their being a stone’s throw away.  Many of the actors Frank knew for decades became friends of his from his early career in these summer stock shows in Massachusetts.  That’s where he met Anne Bancroft.  This was an especially good chapter where the depth of their friendship resounds despite years apart.  He closes:  “…And when the death knell of cancer sounded inside her body, she managed to keep it a secret from most of her friends.  She did not reach out to me in her final years, and I was unaware of the extent of her illness … She died … I opened the French doors to (my) patio and walked out listening to the Pacific, remembering the night thousands of miles across it in Malibu that I had thrown away a close relationship with a woman who could be funny, warm, and smart, but a friend I could no longer endure (they argued when Frank told a story about her downing Valium with scotch before a performance which she vehemently denied).  Any relationship in which one party feels even the slightest sense of diminishment had become for me a relationship not worth enduring.  I did not so much regret my decision to pull away from her ultimately corrosive aura as I did bemoan the demons that held sway inside her; they becoming the friends she most listened to and believed.  I have never asked Mel if Annie found some respite during her illness in her final years.  I’m not certain that I want to hear the answer.”  I think Frank doesn’t want to find out he reached the wrong conclusion.  He can be a great friend, but a cool one.

The biography is rife with sex, recounting some stars' joy in hearing the dirtiest of jokes, and dealing openly with who was gay and who was seducing whom.  Frank admits himself regarding Raul Julia as his “boyfriend.”  Unlike Carole King’s Natural Woman which I found stale and flat in its adherence to strict chronology, Dropped Names, moves freely across countries and time; its structure is Frank’s conscious vehicle to tell his life story as reflections of those he knew.  

He lived in rarefied air.  He does not descend into the banal, never flaunting his own lusts, affairs, marriages or family life.  He calculates, he is “in role.”  Nonetheless, the reader becomes a fan, a part of the audience that he needs but cannot see.  Unlike Carole, there are no promotional shots or photographs of his younger self:  there he is on the back cover, a man in his 70s, 35 pound heavier that his Count Dracula days, but still with that Julius Caesar glorious head, now gray.  The last movie I saw him in, forgetting the title, the one with Liam Neesom and January Jones as spies in Berlin: ; Frank is the aging old school international bad guy spy, almost looking as large as Orson Welles, cold, calculating, righteous rage … portraying under the surface emotions only hinted at in the book.

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Can’t Believe Robb Wrote One I Don’t Like


A secret vice of mine is reading J. D. Robb’s “In Death” series, murder mysteries set in New York City in the 2050’s-60’s.  What made these books quick fun reads was not only Dallas and Rourke, the main two characters, but the setting, so futuristic and ethically challenging given the advance of science and the loosening of old fashioned morals.  Unfortunately in her latest, Celebrity in Death, Robb has written a story that could have taken place in 1930, so devoid of setting and science fiction.  Robb is capitalizing on her cult fans, writing only a soap opera like update on what is going on in D & R’s love life and how Peabody is developing as a nascent detective.  Dallas doesn’t even have a meaningful argument with her butler!

The murder is classic Hollywood who killed the movie star schlock.  It is predictable, formulaic and way too easy to figure whodunit.  Robb, herself a celebrity, has turned deadly in her writing.





Wednesday, May 9, 2012

The Virtual Road to Wellville


Why does David Agus’ book The End of Illness remind me of John Harvey Kellogg and cereal advertising claims?  Not because his ideas for promoting personal health are “flakey,” but because his arguments seem to be self-promoting.  Agus has founded Applied Proteomics, a company that hopes to eventually be able to analyze a person’s molecular proteins much like their DNA is decoded today.  Does an endorsement by Al Gore make the reader think of this effort more favorably or remind one of inventing the Internet and global warming inevitability?

Whenever I am home during the week, I inevitably watch Dr Oz hoping that the foods he talks about will be the magic ingredients to perfect wellness.  Then one day, Dr Oz had A J Jacobs on as a guest.  A J the comic wise ass who tried to read the entire Encyclopedia Britannica cover to cover, and I guess he did, more recently spent two or three years trying out every health fad to see what works.  A J still looked a little pudgy and was going bald and he wisely did not put himself on the cover of his book a la Jane Fonda.  So with this context, these books about I know where curing the curse of human disease is going seem to me to all be put together by medical quacks, each touting their one elixir.

Agus other than promoting statins post-40, shunning vitamin supplements, and learning about one’s intestinal flora, does not have any formula or magic bullet.  So he hearkens back to the future:  maintain your body’s homeostasis by a regular schedule of daily living patterns and whole food diets.  He takes the command, “physician, heal thyself” to a “patient, know thine metrics.”  He recaps in chapter 14:
“…. Keep to a schedule.  Move throughout the day … Eat real food to absorb all the nutrients you need.  Reduce your daily dose of inflammation.  Stay abreast of new technologies that can enhance your health or help you to plan your future health.  Share your medical information with the world wherever possible.”  And this guidance from an oncologist?

It is not enough for him to expound an empowered patient who is so in tune with his own personal preventive approach that he will live a relatively healthy and long life … based on technology and huge databases that “will change diagnosis and care as we know it.”  It is a Seventh Day Adventist approach to care, trust in the gods of technology and research, and let your body balance itself too good health.
When oh when will I find another good book after this spell of mediocre?  I am even thinking about bringing back another two library books after trying out the first chapter or two, one of which is even the latest J D Robb “In Death” sequel.  Gone With the Wind, here I come.